RUTGERS, THE STATEUNIVERSITY
OF NEW JERSEY
UNIVERSITY SENATE MINUTES
Regular Meeting of the University
Senate
DATE: April 22, 2005
TIME AND PLACE: 11:37 a.m., Multipurpose
Room, Rutgers Student Center, 126
College Avenue, College Avenue Campus
MEMBERS PRESENT: Abaskharon, Ambar, Atmeh, Banerjee,
Barone, Bell, Bellany, Blasi, Blimling, Bodnar, Boikess, Borisovets, Boyd,
Boylan, Bravo, Brazier, Cannon, Caprio, Cerulo, Chabal, Colin, A. Cooper,
K. Cooper, Cotter, Curry, Curtis, Darien, E. Dennis, Dess, Dholandas, Diner,
DiVito, Dupersoy, Dutta, C. Ellis, N. Ellis, Ezgilioglu, Farrell, Ferguson,
Forero, Friedrich, Furmanski, Gaunt, Gigliotti, Gillett, Goldin, Gould,
Greenhut, Guo, Hall, Herbst, Hmelo-Silver, Hodgson, Hoekzema, Huang, Hughes,
Hyndman, Jackson, Jessen, V. Johnson, Kagan, Kauffman, Kavanagh, Kennedy,
Kirby, Kirschner, Krenos, Krucher, Laguna-Diaz, LaSala, Lashley, Leath,
Lee, Liepmann, Maher, Mangin, Markert, Markowitz, McCabe, McCormick, McKay,
McKeever, Melwani, Messer, Miller, Norville, Obayashi, O’Connell, O’Connor,
Ozbay, Palmon, Panayotatos, Pangilinan, Phillips, Potenza, Puniello, Rabii,
Rabiner, Samuel Rabinowitz, Sidney Rabinowitz, Raykar, Reed, Rubin, Schaich,
Scott, Sifuentes-Jauregui, P. Simmons, R. Simmons, H. Smith, N. Smith,
Spierer, Stauffer, Szatrowski, Tittler, Turner, Turpin, Turvey, Vodak,
Volk, Wang, Whang, Winterbauer, Woolley, Zaborszky
EXCUSED: Axelrod,
Bay, Colaizzi, DeLisi, Fishbein, Hallmark, Hirsh, Hornichter, J. Jones,
R. Jones, Oren, Schock, Schorr, Sherman,
Venuto
ABSENT: Apfel, Baro, Bilodeau, Breton, Butler, Chambers,
Chen, Chernin, Chism, Cronk, Davidson, Dellane, R. Dennis, Desposito, Deutsch,
Diamond, Donsky, Evans, Ezendokwere, Feinberg, Hanna, Holmes, Jesse,W.
Johnson, Klein, Kokini, Kressel, Lake, Leontiades, Leustek, Manhoff, Marsh,
Merandy, Nerurkar, Ocone, Odutola, Ogwu, Perlman, Philps, Rowan, Shahrokh,
Simon, Solomon, Spero, Stark, Tinglin, Tsurumi, Tuckman, Worrall, Zolad
ATTENDANCE SUMMARY: Faculty: Of
90 total: 61 present (68%), 11 excused (12%), 18 absent (20%); Students: Of 56 total: 33 present (59%), 2 excused (4%), 21 absent (37%);
Administrators: Of 37 total: 25 present
(68%), 2 excused (5%), 10 absent (27%); Alumni: Of 6
total: 5 present (83%), 0 excused, 1 absent (17%)
View Senate attendance
record for this year.
NON-VOTINGMEMBERS
PRESENT: Innerfield, Seto
PRESIDING
OFFICER: Martha Cotter, Chairperson
CHAIRPERSON’S REPORT: Chairperson Cotter called the
meeting to order at 11:37 a.m., immediately following collection of the
election ballots from the Organizational Meeting of the 2005-06 University
Senate. Her chairperson’s report included comments on:
-
foregoing the traditional yearly Senate highlights review in order to save
time for the day’s unusual meeting schedule and heavy agenda; and
-
an
explanation of the day’s agenda, wherein:
-
the Regular Meeting of the Senate began immediately following collection
of ballots from the morning’s election;
-
the
Regular Meeting begins with committee reports, which would continue to
approximately 12:00 noon, at which time the Senate would recess for lunch;
-
lunch,
provided by President McCormick’s office, would be available for Senators
in the Lounge area, beginning at noon;
-
caucuses
would be held as usual during the lunch hour;
-
the
meeting would reconvene at 1:10 p.m.;
-
the
afternoon session would begin with President McCormick’s administrative
report, and would continue with committee reports; and
-
committee
reports would come to the floor based on priorities previously established
by the Senate Executive Committee, as well as time available before the
lunch recess.
REPORT OF THE SECRETARY: Agenda: Secretary
Swalagin said that 10-minute discussion time limits would be in effect
for most of the committee reports. Senator Adam Cooper moved
to table the University Structure and Governance Committee’s response to
Charge S-0401 on Faculty and Student Board of Governors Membership. Parliamentarian
Smith said that the motion should be to remove the item from the agenda,
rather than to table. Senator Cooper amended his motion accordingly. Duly
seconded, the Senate’s two-thirds vote removed the item from the agenda. The
agenda was approved
as amended.
Minutes: On motion and duly seconded,
the Minutes of the March
11, 2005 Senate meeting were approved as distributed by the Secretary.
Communications: The following communications were
presented by the Secretary:
-
Budget
and Finance Committee Response
to Charge S-0405, Travel Reimbursement Policy, which was offered to
the Senate as a communication, without presentation by the committee, and
with no call for Senate action at the current time;
-
Letters
from President McCormick acknowledging Senate action, reports and/or advice:
Senator O’Connor, co-chair of the Budget and Finance
Committee, said that Senator Turvey wrote his committee’s report on Rutgers’
Travel Reimbursement Policy. He thanked Senator Turvey, the
Budget and Finance Committee, and Vice President Kavanagh for their work
on the report and revision of the policy. He distributed some
documents related to the report.
COMMITTEE REPORT
[The first committee report began at 11:45 a.m.]
Academic
Standards, Regulations and Admissions Committee (ASRAC) - Michelle
Brazier and Craig Oren, Co-chairs; Martha Cotter, Subcommittee Chair; Response
to Charge S-0317, Faculty Role in Undergraduate Student Recruitment and
Admissions
Senator Oren, committee co-chair, was unable to attend
the meeting.Senate Vice Chair Rabinowitz assumed the chair
as Senator Cotter, who co-chaired the ASRAC subcommittee on this charge,
and Senator Brazier, ASRAC co-chair, presented and summarized the committee’s
response to Charge S-0317, Faculty Role in Undergraduate Student Recruitment
and Admissions. The committee had been charged as follows: “Review
the current practices for faculty involvement in both recruiting and admitting
undergraduate students to Rutgers University. Determine
whether faculty and faculty admissions committees are active participants
in the process, whether University Regulations are being met, and whether
the role of faculty should be expanded. (Documents regarding
faculty role in admissions include: Senate Resolution A-8420; University
Regulations, Section 2.12; Motion passed by the Livingston Fellows on June
8, 2000; NBFC recommendation of April 26, 2002).” Following
brief discussion, the question was called, and the report and its recommendations
were adopted by the Senate.
RECESS: The
Senate recessed for lunch at 12:00 noon.
RECONVENING: The Senate reconvened
at 1:25 p.m.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: President McCormick delivered
the administrative report, which included comments on:
-
his
and approximately 24 students’ recent trip to Washington, DC to talk to
legislators about student financial aid, and the student delegation’s very
effective communication of their viewpoints on the issue;
-
Rutgers’
budget and state funding, which is expected to include a proposal for level
base funding for Rutgers, but funding for only one-quarter of salary increases;
-
the
Constituency Research Project, and related plans for a significant communication
effort over the next few years aimed at identifying what messages would
most effectively clarify and improve public perceptions of Rutgers;
-
discussions
and plans aimed at beautifying all of Rutgers’
campuses;
-
Task
Force on Undergraduate Education activities, centering on the Task Force’s
charge to undertake an ambitious and comprehensive look at all aspects
of undergraduate student life, and an anticipated report; and
-
three
themes that prevail as work areas for the administration in the year ahead:
-
renewed commitment to seize opportunities to improve Rutgers
in every conceivable area;
-
addressing
confusions in perceptions of Rutgers, what Rutgers is, and what Rutgers
does; and
-
streamlining
the organizational complexity of Rutgers.
Following the report, President McCormick responded to questions, or heard
comments, regarding:early planning for changes to the College
Avenue Campus; the need to retain the colleges’ history, identities and
traditions when moving forward with the new vision for Rutgers University;
appreciation for the commitment to expand the Livingston Campus Center;
appreciation for his overall leadership; and a request that the University
College-New Brunswick student center also be expanded.
COMMITTEE REPORTS (Continued)
Faculty
Affairs and Personnel Committee (FAPC) - Ann Brooks Gould and
Paul Panayotatos, Co-chairs, Response
to Charge A-0410, Clinical and Professional Practice Faculty Tracks
Senators Gould and Panayotatos, co-chairs of the Faculty
Affairs and Personnel Committee, summarized their committee’s response
to Charge A-0410, Clinical and Professional Practice Faculty Tracks. The
committee had been charged as follows: “Review and respond
to the administration's proposals regarding Clinical and Professional Practice
Tracks for the Graduate School of Applied and Professional
Psychology; Rutgers Business School
in New Brunswick and Newark,
and the School of Business-Camden;
and the Mason Gross School
of the Arts. Report to Senate Executive Committee by May 2005.”
Discussion of the report’s recommendations and resolution
resulted in the following successful motions to amend:
-
Senator Messer’s motion to add to the definition of “clinical track” language
indicating that it involves care of and/or delivery of service to patients
or clients as well as teaching on the delivery of such service (accepted
as a friendly amendment);
-
Senator Diner’s motion to add “or the provost” to Recommendation 5, so
that it begins “It is also recommended that any request from a unit to
the EVPAA or the provost for an appointment or promotion to clinical track
be accompanied by” (accepted as a friendly amendment);
The Senate then adopted the report and recommendations,
as amended.
[EXTENSION OF MEETING TIME: At
this point in the proceedings, the Senate approved Senator DiVito’s motion
to extend the overall meeting time until consideration of, and action on,
the Senate Bylaws Review was completed.]
University
Structure and Governance Committee - Joseph Blasi and Kathleen Scott,
Co-chairs, Response
to Charge S-0324, Senate Bylaws Review (Part 2, Senate Handbook)
Senators Blasi and Scott, co-chairs of the University
Structure and Governance Committee (USGC), summarized their committee’s
response to Charge S-0324, Senate Bylaws Review (Part 2, Senate Handbook). The
committee had been charged as follows: “Review Senate
bylaws and enabling University Regulations as outlined in the Senate Handbook,
and make recommendations for revisions, particularly regarding Senate membership,
officer eligibility and requirements. Consult with Senate
secretary and chair to identify specific aspects of the bylaws and regulations
to be examined.”
The Senate considered the report’s
articles eight articles individually. Discussion resulted in
the following successful motions to amend:
-
Article I: Role of the Senate - No amendments.
-
Article II: Role of the Central Administration - No amendments.
-
Article III: Senate Meetings:
- Senator
Simmons’ motion to amend Section E, “Voting,” item 2, to read:“If
requested by any Senator, a secret ballot shall be conducted.All
other motions for a specific voting procedure shall require a majority
vote.”
- Senator
Panayotatos’ motion to amend Section D, “Procedures,” item 1, to include
the penultimate sentence:“More stringent time limits to speakers
can be applied if recommended by the Executive Committee (for approval
by the Senate) and indicated on the agenda.”(Accepted as a
friendly amendment.)
- Senator
Panayotatos’ motion to add to Section E, “Voting,” the following two items:
- 3. If the election for Senate chair is contested, then it
shall be conducted separately. Nominations for vice chair and the Executive
Committee will be closed only after the announcement of the results of the
chair election. The same will hold for the Executive Committee nominations if
the vice chair election is contested. The elections for Board of Trustees and
Board of Governors representatives may be conducted simultaneously with those
for officers of the Senate, but senators will be allowed to run for more than
one position.
- 4. Any senator can request to see the vote tally
of any voting procedure in which votes are tallied. With respect to elections,
the right is limited to candidates.
-
Article IV: Senate Procedures:
- Senator
Panayotatos’ motion to amend Section B to read: “Normally all
communications to the Senate or its Executive Committee should be addressed
to the secretary of the Senate. Exceptions include confidential
communications to the chair, such as evaluations of deans, which can be
addressed directly to the chair of the Senate. Referrals to
committee, when appropriate, are made by the Executive Committee.”
- Senator
Nicole Smith’s motion to amend Section C, “Recurring Senate Actions Having
Fixed Dates,” as follows: “First Week of April: The
election of senators in various units must be completed.” The
original deadline for this action had been March 15.(Accepted
as a friendly amendment.)
-
Article VII: Responsibilities of Senate Officers:
- Senator
Hoekzema’s motion to amend Section E, “Senate-Elected Representatives to
the Board of Governors and the Board of Trustees,” item 3, to begin with
the following sentence: “Each student-elected faculty or student
representative serves as an advocate of the Senate view when appropriate,
to the members of the Boards.”
- Senator
Cooper’s motion to amend Section E, “Senate-Elected Representatives to
the Board of Governors and the Board of Trustees,” item 1, to eliminate
the Senate-membership-requirement exclusion for student representatives
to the Board of Trustees.Item 2 to be amended accordingly.
- Senator
Panayotatos’ motion to change all references to the Senate secretary in
the Handbook and in the Bylaws to read “executive secretary.” (Accepted
as a friendly amendment.)
- Senator
Panayotatos’ motion to amend Section C, “Executive Secretary,” to exclude
the executive secretary from eligibility to run for, or be elected to,
the University Senate.
-
Article VIII: Committees of the Senate:
- Senator
Panayotatos’ motion to amend the Academic Standards, Regulations and Admissions
Committee’s standing charge to include the elements of the additional function
to act as a university-wide admissions committee. (Accepted
as a friendly amendment.)
- Senator
McKeever’s motion to codify the meaning of “patent and human subjects policies”
in the Faculty Affairs and Personnel Committee’s standing charge.
Each article was adopted by the Senate individually
after it was discussed. Following discussion, amendment, and
adoption of the individual articles, the Handbook in its entirety was adopted
by the Senate, with one opposing vote, and one abstention.
ADJOURNMENT:The meeting adjourned
at 4:56 p.m.
Kenneth Swalagin
Executive Secretary of the University Senate