RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
SENATE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
M I N U T E S
February 10, 2012
MEMBERS PRESENT: Barraco (by phone), Borisovets, Bubb, Gillett,
Gould,
McKeever, Panayotatos (Chair), Puhak, Rosario, Swalagin (Executive Secretary)
MEMBERS EXCUSED: Muse,
Paterno,Thompson, Yoon
ALSO
ATTENDING: Cotter
(Faculty BOT Representative), Fehn (Administrative
Liaison), Greenhut (Research, and Graduate & Professional Education
Committee Co-chair), Rabinowitz (Faculty BOG
Representative), Shapiro (New
Brunswick Faculty Liaison), Spiegel (Faculty BOT Representative)
The regular meeting of the University Senate Executive Committee was
held on
Friday, February 10, 2012 at 1:10 p.m. in the Executive Board Room of
Administrative Services Building-III, Cook Campus.
1. Chairperson’s Report
Senate and Executive Committee Chairperson Paul Panayotatos called the
meeting to order at 1:12 p.m. He reported that the New Brunswick
Faculty Council had adopted a resolution asking that the two
recommendations on Rutgers (regarding the medical school, and
Rutgers-Camden) contained in the UMDNJ Advisory Committee Final Report
be separated, and urging Rutgers' Board of Governors and Board of
Trustees to vote "yes" on the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and
other units being merged with Rutgers, but to vote "no" on the proposal
to separate Rutgers-Camden from Rutgers University and combine it with
Rowan University.
2. Secretary’s Report - Ken Swalagin, Executive Secretary of the Senate
3. Administrative Liaison
Bruce Fehn, Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration, presented an administrative report which included comments on:
- the Joint Investment Committee of the Board of Governors and
Board of Trustees attention to, and management of, Rutgers endowment,
particularly in light of the virtually zero interest rates, and the
decision to reduce spending allocations from the endowment; and
- other ramifications of the global economic downturn on Rutgers' endowment, fundraising, and operating costs.
4. Standing Committees
Committee Reports:
Research, and Graduate and Professional Education Committee Response
to Charge S-1107, Publication Repository/Open Access -
Research, and Graduate and Professional Education Committee (RGPEC)
Co-chair Victor Greenhut summarized his committee's response to Charge
S-1107 on Publication Repository/Open Access. Several members of the
Executive Committee expressed concerns related to payment of surcharges
that might be imposed by journals and publishers when open access is
required. The report was discussed at some length, and eventually was
sent back to committee, as the RGPEC had requested. The RGPEC will
conduct additional discussions and consultation with faculty, legal
counsel, and others before bringing the report back to the Executive
Committee in October 2012. The Senate will also hold a
committee-of-the-whole discussion on this report and charge at the
upcoming meeting in Camden.
Instruction, Curricula and Advising Committee Response
to Charge S-1104 on Online Teaching Evaluations, and Best Practices in Evaluation of Teaching Performance
- ICAC
Chair Natalie
Borisovets summarized her committee's work on Charge S-1104 on Online
Teaching Evaluations, and Best Practices in Evaluation of Teaching
Performance. Consistent with the original charge, the report will go to
the
Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee for review and comment before
being docketed for action by the Senate. Peter Gillett asked that a
recommendation be added regarding best practice for closing the online
evaluation window after the timing of final grades. Borisovets said she
would amend the report after consulting with Monica Devanas of CTAAR.
Paul Panayotatos asked for revision of the section regarding paper
versus online evaluations. Borisovets will consult with CTAAR, then
revise the report and email it to the FPAC chairs and Ken Swalagin. The
FPAC will respond to the Executive Committee on this report in
March.
Proposed
Charges, and Charge Deadlines:
Proposed Charge to Budget and Finance
Committee (BFC) on Questions Related to the Final Report of the UMDNJ
Advisory Committee (a/k/a the "Barer Report") - BFC Chair Menahem Spiegel had proposed that the following charge be issued to his committee:
The proposals of the Barer "Final Report
(UMDNJ Advisory Committee 1/25/2012) raise important questions concerning their
ramifications for budgetary and fiscal health of Rutgers University. Including
queries over the viability of shared Rutgers programs to be separated,
responsibilities for the values embodied in RU-Camden facilities, the burden of
debts of UMDNJ for Rutgers, the financial strength of the units to join Rutgers
and the disentangling of commingled assets and endowment funds among other
conceivable issues. The Budget and Finance Committee is instructed to provide a
careful formulation of the questions of a fiscal nature for investigation
before such a significant move takes place.
The isssue was discussed, with Vice President Fehn responding to many
comments and questions related to the timing and financial aspects of
the proposed merger with the medical school, as well as the proposed
separation of Rutgers-Camden. After considerable discussion, the
Executive Committee declined to issue the charge, but asked the Budget
and Finance Committee to formulate a list of questions informally, and
bring those to the Executive Committee, which would in turn ask
President McCormick to provide responses.
Proposed Charge to the Student Affairs Committee on Separation of Rutgers-Camden:The
Student Affairs Committee (SAC), Alumni Caucus, and Student Caucus had
requested that the SAC be issued a charge on the proposed
separation of
Rutgers-Camden from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, as
follows:
Examine
the short- and long-term ramifications of the proposed separation of
Rutgers-Camden from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey as
relate to, and from the perspectives of, past, present, and prospective
students.
The rationale for the charge had been stated as follows: "There
are many issues of concern to students, prospective students, and
alumni that go well beyond the financial and political, including but
not limited to the relative value of a Rutgers-Camden diploma, the
effects on present enrollment and perception of the institution by
prospective students. These are issues that are not adequately
addressed in the current report rationale."
The Executive Committee issued the charge, and a parallel charge to the
Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee to respond from the faculty and
staff perspective. Both charges were assigned an April 2012 deadline
for responding to the Executive Committee.
Expiring Pending-Charge Deadlines:
Pending charges on which deadlines are expiring were discussed. Several
deadlines were extended as suggested by the charged committees' chairs.
On some other charges, the Executive Committee decided that,
pursuant to Senate policies on charge deadlines, they would review the
pending charges in March and decide which should be renewed, and which,
if any, should be allowed to lapse.
5. University Senate Agenda
The February 24 Senate meeting will be held in Camden, and will
include Camden Chancellor Wendell Pritchett's Camden Campus Report, the
committee-of-the-whole discussion on the RGPEC's "Publication
Repository" report docketed above, and an open forum on the potential
separation of Rutgers-Camden.
6. Old Business
There was no old business.
7. New
Business
Sam Rabinowitz mentioned webpages related to the Rutgers-Camden
separation. Ken Swalagin will post links to the sites on the Senate
website.
8.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m.
Written and submitted by,
Ken Swalagin
Executive Secretary of the University Senate