RUTGERS UNIVERSITY SENATE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
M I N U T E S
April 8, 2016


MEMBERS PRESENT: Borisovets, Cotter, Gillett, Gould (Chair), Janniger, Langer, Lee, Okuwobi, Oliver, Puhak, Schulberg, Swalagin (Executive Secretary), Thompson

MEMBERS EXCUSED:   Barraco, Otto, Theiss

ALSO ATTENDING: B. Lee (Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs), S. Rabinowitz (Faculty Representative to the Board of Governors), A. Samant (Faculty Representative to the Board of Trustees)

The regular meeting of the University Senate Executive Committee was held on Friday, April 8, 2016 at 1:10 p.m. in the Executive Board Room of Administrative Services Building-III, Cook Campus.

1. Chair’s Report 

Senate and Executive Committee Chair Ann Gould called the meeting to order at 1:18 p.m. She said that the committee would be addressing a full agenda, and asked that members keep their remarks brief. She commented on:
2.    Secretary’s Report - Ken Swalagin, Executive Secretary of the Senate
[Senator Schulberg joined the meeting at 1:45, during discussion of the draft schedule of 2016-17 meetings.]

3.    Administrative Report -
Barbara Lee, Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs

Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs Barbara Lee presented an Administrative Report on President Barchi's behalf, which included comments on:
4.    Standing Committees

Reports:

Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee (FPAC) Response to Charge S-1409 on Greater Integration of Contingent Faculty in the Rutgers Community - Ann Gould and Joseph Markert, FPAC Co-chairs

FPAC Co-chair Ann Gould summarized her committee's response to Charge S-1409 on Greater Integration of Contingent Faculty in the Rutgers Community. The FPAC had been charged as follows: "Given the ever increasing use of contingent faculty (NTT and PTL) at Rutgers and nationally, consider ways to integrate these faculty fully into the University community. Identify other institutions that have been successful in providing such rights and privileges to their contingent faculty and propose measures to emulate them. In particular, consider ways to afford contingent faculty the security necessary to be more active participants in shared governance, as well as more visible members of the community." Minor changes were suggested, and the report was docketed for action at the upcoming Senate meeting.

[Senator Barbara Lee left the meeting at 2:15 p.m.]

Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee (FPAC) Response to Charge A-1603 on Evaluation of Administrators, Part II: Evaluation of Chancellors - Ann Gould and Joseph Markert, FPAC Co-chairs

FPAC Co-chair Ann Gould summarized her committee's response to Charge A-1603 on Evaluation of Administrators, Part II: Evaluation of Chancellors. The FPAC had been charged as follows:  "Given the joint Rutgers-UMDNJ integration and changes in administrative structure, reconsider the process recommended by the University Senate in 2012 for evaluation of upper administrators, now with a focus on evaluating chancellors.  Respond to the Senate Executive Committee by April 2016.  [Issued November 2012. Reissued June 2015. Revised to focus on evaluation of chancellors, and reissued as A-1603 March 2016.]" Minor changes were suggested, and the report was docketed for action at the upcoming Senate meeting.

Student Affairs Committee (SAC) Response to Charge S-1305-2 on Smoke-Free Rutgers - Robert Barraco, Zachary Borden, and Samuel Rabinowitz, SAC Co-chairs

The SAC had been charged as follows: Examine the desirability, feasibility, impact and means of evolving into a smoke-free Rutgers. SAC Co-chair Sam Rabinowitz withdrew the draft report on Charge S-1401 (see below). The draft report on Charge S-1305-2 was discussed briefly, with Rabinowitz saying the SAC would try to have a final report ready for the upcoming Senate meeting. Ken Swalagin suggested that he and Rabinowitz could edit the draft and circulate it to the Executive Committee by the following Friday, with the intent of docketing it for Senate action at the April 29 Senate meeting. [Note: The report was not completed, nor was it docketed for the April 29 Senate.]

Rutgers' Smoking Policy
Smoke-Free and Tobacco-Free U.S. and Tribal Colleges and Universities

Student Affairs Committee (SAC) Response to Charge S-1401 on Taking Courses on Other Campuses/Intercampus Equivalency - Robert Barraco, Zachary Borden, and Samuel Rabinowitz, SAC Co-chairs

The SAC was charged as follows: Examine obstacles preventing students from accessing educational resources located on other Rutgers campuses. If deemed appropriate, recommend policy and process changes that would promote growth of inter-campus collaboration. Refer to the Student Caucus proposal for this charge when deliberating. Identify issues to be further considered by the Instruction, Curricula and Advising Committee, if necessary. As noted above, SAC Co-chair Sam Rabinowitz withdrew the draft report on this charge at this meeting.

Issues/Charges:

Proposed Charge to University Structure and Governance Committee (USGC) on Process for Unit Mergers or Other Structural Changes in Non-academic Units that have Broad Educational Impact  - As stipulated in the USGC report on Charge S-1403, Process for Unit Mergers or Other Structural Changes

The following proposed charge was discussed and issued to the USGC pursuant to a recommendation in the original report on Charge S-1403 on Process for Unit Mergers or Other Structural Changes: Consider and recommend a procedure, timeline, template and process for merger or dissolution of, or making structural changes to, non-academic units that have a broad educational impact. Refer to the Senate report and recommendations on Charge S-1403, Process for Unit Mergers or Other Structural Changes, when considering this charge. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by March 2017.

5.    Old Business

Instruction, Curricula and Advising Committee (ICAC) Response to Charge S-1504 on Determination of Student Participation [Linked is the report as adopted by the Senate on April 29, 2016.] - Natalie Borisovets, ICAC Chair

This report was postponed at the February and April 1 Senate meetings. The ICAC was charged as follows: "Develop guidelines that would allow units and individual instructors to comply with U.S. Department of Education requirements that Rutgers keep records for students receiving federal financial aid that substantiate students' participatory attendance in the classes for which they are registered." ICAC Chair Natalie Borisovets summarized the revised report. The charge was revised to refer to "Student Participation" instead of the original "Student Attendance." It was decided that both the original report, and this revised version would be docketed for the April 29 Senate, and that Borisovets will first withdraw the original report before moving the current version.

Proposed Charge on Sale of Alcohol in Stadiums
- Submitted by New Brunswick Student Member of the EC Justin Schulberg. This proposal was discussed at the previous EC meeting, at which time it was decided that an ad hoc committee is to be formed consisting of chairs of standing committees or their representatives, plus three other people to be selected by the EC. The rationale and proposed, draft charge shown below were discussed.

Rationale: "After RUSA passed a resolution calling for the sale of alcohol in stadiums, specifically looking at the Rutgers Athletic Center (RAC) and High Point Solution Stadium, it is incumbent upon the Senate to also look into this matter. This issue does not just affect New Brunswick students, which RUSA represents, but it stretches to the domain of faculty, staff, alumni, and countless others who attend Rutgers' athletic events. This issue is heated and dynamic, as it has broad-reaching consequences. As the most representative body at Rutgers University, it is necessary for the University Senate to look into the sale of alcohol in the stadiums and advise President Barchi on its investigation and recommendations into the matter."

Proposed, Draft Charge to the Ad Hoc Committee on Sale of Alcohol in Stadiums: Consider the rationale and RUSA resolution on the potential sale of alcohol at Rutgers stadiums. Explore the issue, and make recommendations, as appropriate. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by [insert deadline].

The rationale was revised as follows:

After RUSA passed a resolution calling for the sale of alcohol in stadiums, specifically looking at the Rutgers Athletic Center (RAC) and High Point Solution Stadium, it is appropriate for the Senate to also look into this matter. This issue does not just affect New Brunswick students, which RUSA represents, but it stretches to the domain of faculty, staff, alumni, and countless others who attend Rutgers' athletic events. This issue is heated and dynamic, as it has broad-reaching consequences. As the most representative body at Rutgers University, it is appropriate for the University Senate to look into the sale of alcohol in the stadiums and advise President Barchi on its investigation and recommendations into the matter.

The charge was revised as follows:

Sale of Alcohol in Athletic Venues: Consider the rationale and RUSA resolution on the potential sale of alcohol at Rutgers athletic venues. Explore this and related issues, including NCAA rules, and make recommendations, as appropriate. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by [insert deadline].

There was considerable discussion of how to issue this charge. The EC ultimately decided the charge would be brought back to be issued to an ad hoc committee after the ad hoc committee on webstreaming and archiving Senate meeting videos completes its work on that charge. A committee-of-the-whole discussion on the issue may also be held at a Senate meeting.

[Senator Rabinowitz left the meeting at 3:47 during the above discussion on sale of alcohol at athletic venues.]

Annual Review of All Outstanding, Pending Committee Charges
: Charges issued to committees lapse in March of the year following the year in which the charge was issued. Outstanding, pending charges were reviewed, and continued with new deadlines, dropped, or otherwise acted upon, as follows:
Review of Senate Report and Recommendations on Size and Composition of the Senate: Senator Gillett successfully moved issuance of the following charge to the University Structure and Governance Committee:

Size and Composition of the Senate, Reviewed: As mandated in the December 2012 Senate Response to Charge S-1201, on Senate Size and Composition, reconsider the size and composition of the Senate. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by February 2017.

Proposal on Webstreaming and Archiving Senate Meeting Videos - Submitted by Justin Schulberg, New Brunswick Student Executive Committee Member: This issue had been discussed by the EC at several meetings. At this meeting, it was decided that Ken Swalagin would solicit volunteers for an ad hoc committee, and that it will meet in the morning on June 3, before the Executive Committee meeting. Ann Gould volunteered to chair at that meeting. The charge to the committee will be:

Consider the feasibility and desirability of videorecording and live webstreaming University Senate meetings, and archiving those videorecordings online for later viewing. Include in discussions aspects of the issue as transparency, technology, costs, benefits, audience, need, personal privacy of participants, etc. Present arguments both for and against the streaming and archiving. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by February 2017.

Proposed Charge on Test-Optional Admissions - Submitted by Senator Robert Boikess: The following charge, proposed by Senator Boikess, was discussed again: "Dear EC Members, Perhaps it might be appropriate for you to issue a charge related to 'test optional admissions' in light of this new information from today's [January 26, 2016] Inside Higher Ed." This issue was discussed at the previous EC meeting, during which ASRAC Co-chair Martha Cotter said she would consult with Vice President for Enrollment Management Courtney McAnuff on the matter before the EC considers issuing a charge to the ASRAC. At this meeting, it was decided that no charge would be issued at this time for various reasons, including that the Honors College is definitely using tests, and that the matter may be better addressed through the New Brunswick Faculty Council.

Timelines and Membership for Commencement Panel/Committees - From Kim Pastva, Interim Secretary of the University: The following communication from Kim Pastva was discussed:

"We are in the process of getting the call [for honorary-degree and commencement-speaker nominations] out to the community. My suggested timeline is: [Ken Swalagin's notations in brackets.]

"After the Senate receives the nominations, how much time do you think you will need for review and ranking? Do you think we could have the results by the end of May (after graduation?) Then the administrations can meet and start making offers over the summer. I think we should then do a call in September 2016 for 2018's commencement. Barbara Lee suggested that, and that would certainly give us a lot of time to get on people's calendars."

Senator members of Chancellors' Commencement Committees were selected from lists of volunteers. Sam Rabinowitz said he would identify student volunteers from Camden; Edmund Janniger said he would identify student volunteers from Newark. The names are to be sent to the chancellors on behalf of the Executive Committee, acting as the University Commencement Panel for this year. Details of this process appear in the Senate response to Charge S-1410 on Honorary Degree and Commencement Speaker Selection Process (including timelines). The Senate will now be undertaking this process on an 18-month (prior to the commencement date), starting in September. The Secretary of the University will solicit nominations each fall, and the Senate's University Commencement Panel will be constituted each September.

6.    New Business

Nominating Panel 2016:
Ken Swalagin summarized the nominations received to date for Senate leadership and board representative positions. He will send another email to the Senate soliciting additional nominations for the slate that will be presented to the 2016-17 Senate at the organizational/election meeting on April 29.

7
.    University Senate Agenda

April 29, 2016 Senate Meetings:
Agendas were established for the April 29, 2016 Senate regular meeting and organizational meeting.


8.    Adjournment

The meeting adjourned at 5:03 p.m.

Minutes written and submitted by,

Ken Swalagin
Executive Secretary of the University Senate