RUTGERS UNIVERSITY SENATE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
M I N U T E S
September 7, 2007
MEMBERS
PRESENT: Becker, Borisovets, Cooke, Cotter, Gould, Greenhut, Leath (Vice
Chair), McCall, Puniello, Rabinowitz (Chair), Stein, Swalagin (Executive
Secretary), Thompson
EXCUSED:
Bodnar
ALSO
ATTENDING: Busia (Faculty Representative to the Board of Trustees), Fowler
(Graduate Student Representative to the Board of Trustees), Furmanski
(Administrative Liaison), Gliserman (New
Brunswick Campus Faculty Liaison), McCormick (Administrative
Liaison)
The regular meeting of the University
Senate Executive Committee was held on Friday, September 7, 2007 at 1:10 p.m.
in the Executive Conference Room of Administrative Services Building-III, Cook
Campus.
1. Chairperson’s Report
Senate and Executive Committee Chair Samuel Rabinowitz
called the meeting to order at 1:18 p.m. He asked everyone to introduce
themselves, and made a brief chairperson's report which included comments on
formation of an ad hoc group to look at the Middle States accreditation report
draft (which was discussed later under "New Business"), and his plans
to meet with President McCormick the following week in Camden to discuss the
year ahead and where the Senate can help build the university.
2. Secretary’s
Report
The committee approved the day's agenda, and the minutes of
the July 20, 2007 Executive Committee meeting, as distributed by Secretary
Swalagin.
3. Standing
Committees
Charge to University Structure and Governance Committee
on Revision of the Senate's Standing Committee Structure: Following
discussion and revision, the Executive Committee approved for issuance to the
University Structure and Governance Committee the following charge to review
the Senate's standing committee structure:
Consider and make recommendations
for modifying the Senate's standing committee structure and/or charges.
Consider the proposals submitted by the Staff Caucus, by Senator Gayle
Stein, and by Senator Martha Cotter when deliberating on this matter.
Consider other committee structure modifications that may be needed or proposed. Solicit input from the
Faculty Affairs and Personnel Committee, Equal Opportunity Committee, or other
committees identified in the proposals or which may be affected by changes
considered or suggested under this charge. Respond to Senate Executive
Committee by February 1, 2008.
4. Administrative
Liaison
President McCormick and Executive Vice President Furmanski
both presented portions of the administrative report. President McCormick
commented on:
- settlement
and ratification or pending ratification of contracts with unionized
employees;
- admissions
and applications;
- fundraising,
and preparations for the capital campaign;
- UMDNJ,
Rutgers' response to the state commission investigating UMDNJ, and what
may be learned or recommended from that process about how Rutgers may be
able to improve its own operations;
- the
state budget, and potential further cuts to Rutgers’
budget for fiscal year 2009;
- creation
of a new position of Vice President for Government Relations;
- launching
of a capital campaign;
- plans
for improvements and further development of Livingston Campus;
- diversity
initiatives, including the “Bright Futures Scholarship Program,” a pilot
to identify and nurture promising New Brunswick/Piscataway, Camden and Newark
high-school students and ultimately bring them to Rutgers
with expenses paid;
- formation
of a committee, and plans to appoint an administrative officer on each
campus to be proactive in guiding the diversification of Rutgers’
faculty; and
- a
proposal and report from the Task Force on Alumni Relations regarding
consolidation of Rutgers’ 19 alumni
association into one.
President McCormick responded to questions on issues which
included:
-
the planned location for, and other elements of,
a new admissions visitor center on Busch Campus;
-
Rutgers’
fundraising history;
-
plans to bring together in a single location all
of the units of the Psychology Department;
-
“convergence,” and the need for places where
students and faculty to meet and congregate;
-
faculty diversity;
-
a suggestion that Oxford University’s
American Association be explored as a model for a consolidated Rutgers Alumni
Association; and
-
plans for further development of the Newark and Camden
campuses.
Executive Vice President Furmanski continued the
administrative report, with comments on:
- the
need and plans for building community into the architecture when
renovating buildings or campuses;
- conglomeration
of schools as an aspect of the planned improvements at Livingston Campus;
- potential
future budget cuts;
- the
capital campaign; and
- reaccreditation.
Vice President Furmanski responded to questions regarding:
- timing
and approaches for the “transformational message” which will be issued in
conjunction with the capital campaign;
- involvement
of students and faculty in the reaccreditation process;
- publication
and availability of documentation generated by the reaccreditation; and
- departmental-review
elements of the reaccreditation.
Vice President Furmanski then continued the administrative
report with a request that the Senate be asked for input on a draft
reaccreditation report. Chairperson Rabinowitz suggested that Bob Goodman, who
chairs the Middle States group, be invited to give an overview of the report at
the October 12 Executive Committee meeting. Noting that the first draft of the
report will be available on October 15, he proposed that a subset of the
Executive Committee and others convene to look at the document as a whole and
see if it “presents Rutgers in a good light.”
Suggestions related to the report could be brought from the group to the
Executive Committee at the October 26 meeting. Rabinowitz proposed that Goodman
then be asked to present an overview of the report and entire reaccreditation
process at the November Senate meeting. Furmanski noted that the Senate would
not be the only venue at which this matter would be discussed, and that
participants in the review were not being asked to review all seven 20-page
sections, but instead to spend more time on the 20 pages that are of individual
interest to the reviewers, and comment on that section.
The Executive Committee agreed to the proposal to form this
ad hoc review group. Rabinowitz said that a working group of about six members
was needed, and proposed that the group meet two or three times over lunch to
discuss the report. He then asked anyone interested to send him an e-mail
indicating their availability and willingness.
Furmanski added that at a later date, in anticipation of the
site visit by the accreditation team, this matter would be opened up to the
full university community for comment.
A link to the online accreditation report will be included
with the November Senate meeting, with instruction to the Senate that it is not
necessary to download the appendices.
[President McCormick left the meeting at 2:53 p.m.]
5. Proposed
Committee Charge
Proposed Charge
to Faculty Affairs and Personnel Committee (FAPC) on "Proposal
to Convert Part-time to Full-time Appointments and Instructional Full-time
Non-tenure-track Appointments to Tenure-track Appointments”. The following charge was discussed and
issued to the FAPC as follows:
Consider and make
recommendations regarding the feasibility of implementing the “Proposal to
Convert Part-time to Full-time Appointments and Instructional Full-time
Non-tenure-track Appointments to Tenure-track Appointments” received
from Professors Zoran Gajic, Karen Thompson, and Richard Moser. Include
considerations on implementation timelines and related issues. Report to Senate
Executive Committee by March 2008.
6. Old
Business
Academic Integrity
Policy Review:
Martha Cotter, co-chair of the Academic Standards,
Regulations and Admissions Committee (ASRAC), summarized the history of that
committee’s ongoing work on Charge S-0408, Academic Integrity Policy Review.
Noting that, although an interim report was made to the Senate in April 2007,
the policy review has been ongoing for three years without resolution. Cotter
and Executive Vice President Furmanski told the Executive Committee that in the
interim they had brought together a group of key people, including ASRAC
members, to document where there are points of general agreement on the policy,
where improvements could be made relatively quickly, and where thorough
reconsideration was needed.
Cotter then proposed forming an ad hoc group, with broad
representation from the university community as well as members of the ASRAC
and university administration who were part of the past work on the charge, to
agree on what may possibly be an interim policy subject to revision over time
as issues are resolved.
[Karen Thompson left the meeting at 3:16 p.m.]
There was considerable discussion about problems with the
policy (particularly those related to the process for separable offenses), the
desire to have broad community input on the policy, and mechanisms for placing
this matter within the Senate structure and function. Natalie Borisovets’s
suggestion to place the ad hoc group’s revised policy on the Senate’s November
2007 agenda as a discussion in committee of the whole was moved by Senator
Becker, and adopted by the Executive Committee.
7. New
Business
Solicitation of
Members of Evaluation Committee: Chairperson Rabinowitz, noting that the
existing process for evaluation of administrators includes submission by the
Senate Executive Committee of names of faculty to serve on the evaluation
committee, and that University Librarian Marianne Gaunt’s evaluation is
approaching, asked the EC to e-mail him suggestions for those potential
evaluators. Vice President Furmanski will select two of the (maximum) eight
names submitted to serve on the evaluation committee.
[Senator Cooke left the meeting at 3:53 p.m.]
8. September
28, 2007 Senate Meeting Agenda: Chairperson
Rabinowitz pointed out that the September 28 Senate meeting will be devoted to
President McCormick’s Annual Address to the Community.
9. Adjournment:
The meeting adjourned at 3:58 p.m.
Kenneth Swalagin
Executive Secretary of the University Senate