Committee Report:
Consider the 1999
Report on the Balance of Full-time and Part-time Faculty Teaching at
Rutgers
University, and, with updated
numbers and charts from the
Office of Academic Affairs, make
recommendations concerning changing trends and shifting
percentages. [Note:
Data received from the administration on this issue in 2010 were
updated but
incomplete. The request for updated information was renewed in March
2012.]
Issues/Proposed Charges:
Proposed Charge to University
Structure and Governance Committee (USGC) on Reviewing Senate and
University Policies on Faculty Eligibility in the Senate, submitted by
Peter Gillett, USGC Co-chair: [Possibly co-charge FPAC] Review
policies relating to Senate eligibility for faculty, and make
recommendations to clarify ambiguities or correct problems relating to
Senate eligibility and definitions of "faculty," "full-time,"
"tenure-track," "non-tenure-track," "part-time," etc. as they relate to
Rutgers and existing UMDNJ employees.
Related
Proposed Charge to USGC submitted by Senator Brian Coleman:
"Clarify the role and positions that full-time, non-tenure-track
faculty
can hold in the Senate, particularly if they are annual appointees."
Rationale: In the
resolution that was passed in April 2001 annuals are mentioned but it
is not
clear if this is in reference to part-time annuals or full-time
annuals.
Proposed Charge to Academic Standards,
Regulations and Admissions Committee on Add/Drop Period, submitted by
Richard Edwards, Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs:
[Follow this link to read EVP
Edwards' March 1, 2013 memo on this matter.] "We are asking that
[the USGC/Senate] consider either:
extending the add/drop period to the end of the second week of classes,
such that
the deadline for both dropping and adding classes would be Friday
September 13;
or, extending one or more of these deadlines to the Monday or Tuesday
of the
following week (September 16/17). If there are other options that
address the
issues raised that the committee would prefer, we would of course be
open to
those as well."
Proposed Charge to ASRAC on Minors
on Campus Policy/Task Force Report, submitted in a Memo
by Richard Edwards, Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs:
"Review and respond to the Report of the Minors on Campus Task Force." [
Members
of the Task Force.]
Proposed Charge to Instruction,
Curricula and Advising Committee (ICAC) or ASRAC on Test-Optional
Admissions, submitted by Senator Robert Boikess: "Look into
whether test-optional admissions should be
implemented for applicants to some or all of our undergraduate schools
and
colleges."
Rationales: 1. Requiring one of the available
standardized tests of all applicants may not be consistent with
achieving a
maximally diverse student body. 2. Results on standardized test are not
the
best predictors of success in college. 3. The costs of preparing for
and taking
a standardized test, sometimes more than once, can be substantial and
may
impose a financial hardship on many students. [See also
Inside
Higher Ed article on this subject.]
Proposed Charge to Budget and Finance Committee
(BFC) on Creating a Smoke-Free Rutgers, submitted by Robert Barraco,
Student Affairs Committee (SAC) Co-chair, on behalf of the
SAC: "Examine the impact and means of evolving into a
smoke-free Rutgers."
[The BFC's standing charge includes the following: "To consider broad
issues related to physical plant and infrastructure,
space, transportation, and safety on and among the three campuses." The
FPAC's standing charge includes the following: "To address issues
related to workplace climate, personnel workload,
career development and opportunities for professional advancement, and
working conditions for all employees in the University." The SAC's
standing charge includes the following: "To examine and address general
student
interests in University policies and operations, including, but not
limited to, such matters as University policies on student use of drugs
and alcohol..."]
Rationale: Current methods of dealing
with second-hand smoke
are ineffective. The 25-foot rule is logistically unenforceable. There
is a
current trend among other universities to create smoke-free campuses.
Large
business campuses are also creating smoke-free environments. Education
regarding the dangers of smoking and second-hand smoke exists, but
needs to be
more prevalent.
Proposed Charge to Faculty and
Personnel Affairs Committee (FPAC) on Dual Career Services/Programs,
submitted by FPAC Co-chair Ann Gould on behalf of the FPAC: "Examine the
desirability of establishing a dual career services program within
Rutgers
Human Resources in order to enhance the ability of Rutgers to recruit
and retain
faculty and staff who may need to relocate to accept a position at the
institution. Research policies at peer
institutions that provide the accompanying partner with the tools and
services
to access resources for an effective job search and make
recommendations as
appropriate."
Potential Issue for Senate Review:
Middle States Periodic (Five-Year) Review
Report: This report may soon be forthcoming from the
administration, possibly with a request for Senate review or
communication.
United States Students Association: The
United States Students Association (USSA) Concept Plan has been
withdrawn by the USSA.
New Jersey
Public Interest Research Group (NJPIRG) Student Chapters Concept Plan:
The Senate Student Affairs Committee reviewed the NJPIRG concept plan,
and responds to the Senate Executive Committee as follows:
"The
Student Affairs Committee of the Rutgers University Senate met in
Newark on 2/22/13.
We reviewed the concept plans from the United States Student
Association (USSA)
and the New Jersey Public Interest Research Group (NJPIRG) Student
Chapters. The Committee decided to
approve both concept plans as written. Both organizations have
demonstrated
value both in the education of and support of students at Rutgers
University. The
USSA concept plan asks for an increase in funding from $0.50 per year
per
student via RUSA to $3.50 per semester per student with an opt out in
order to
improve management of its programs on the state level. The NJPIRG
concept plan
asks for continuance of the current $11.20 fees per semester in an opt
out
manner in order to support its many programs of benefit to our students."
The Senate Executive Committee must
now review the concept plan and determine whether it satisfies the
following requirements as stated in
University Policy
10.3.3
on Special Student Organization Funding:
The Senate Executive
Committee, upon the
recommendation of the Student Affairs Committee (or, in rare
circumstances, on
its own evaluation), shall review and approve the concept plan with
the
criteria of determining whether the educational value of the
organization
justifies the proposed investment in resources, and that the
organization has
demonstrated the need for the funding mechanism outlined in these
procedures.
The University Senate Executive Committee shall make a recommendation
to the
University President within thirty (30) class days after the first
regularly
scheduled meeting of the Senate’s Student Affairs Committee
following receipt
of the petitioning student organization’s concept plan and all
required
supporting documents.
The Executive Secretary of the Senate will forward to the University
President
and the Vice President for Student Affairs and/or Associate/Vice
Chancellor(s)
for Student Affairs any such concept plans, recommendations, and
supporting
documents.