RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
SENATE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
M I N U T E S
September 7, 2012
MEMBERS PRESENT: Barraco (by phone), Berman, Boikess,
Borisovets,
Bubb, Dantzler, Gould, Muse, Panayotatos (Chair), Puhak,
Swalagin
(Executive
Secretary), Thompson
MEMBERS EXCUSED: Gillett
ALSO
ATTENDING: Barchi (Administrative Liaison/University President),
Cashin (Student Board of Governors Representative), Cotter
(Faculty Board of Trustees Representative), Edwards (Administrative
Liaison/Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs), Greenhut
(Senate Parliamentarian), O'Conner (New
Brunswick Faculty Liaison), Rabinowitz (Faculty
Board of Governors
Representative), Rosario (Newark College of Arts and Sciences Student),
Spiegel (Faculty Board of Trustee
Representative)
The regular meeting of the University Senate Executive Committee was
held on
Friday, September 7, 2012 at 1:10 p.m. in the Executive Board Room of
Administrative Services Building-III, Cook Campus.
1. Chairperson’s Report
Senate and Executive Committee Chairperson Paul Panayotatos called the
meeting to order at 1:26 p.m. He welcomed everyone to what he said
"promises to be an interesting academic year." Panayotatos then called
for introductions of all present. He said that this would be his last
year as Senate chair, and spoke briefly about his past years of service
as chair. He said he had met with President Barchi over the summer, but
that it was not in the context of the Senate chair and vice chair's
official semiannual meeting, adding that he was hopeful that President
Barchi would be able to attend future Executive Committee meetings.
2. Secretary’s Report - Ken Swalagin,
Executive Secretary of the Senate
- Agenda: The meeting agenda
was approved.
- Minutes:
- Communications - The following communications were presented by
the secretary, and acted upon as indicated::
- Targum
Concept Plan - Discussed
separately later on the agenda under "Standing
Committees - Issues/Proposed Charges."
- Members of the School of Communication and Information Decanal
Evaluation Committee have been selected: Mark Aakhus, Daniel Goldstein,
Susan Keith, Jerry Kukor, Kim Manning, Sue Schurman, Ross Todd, Myoung
Wilson (Goldstein and Wilson were nominated by the Senate Executive
Committee) - Noted.
- Review of SAS-NB Executive Dean Greenberg will not go forward
because he is no longer in the position. Noted.
- Last year, Gayle Stein had asked the Executive Committee to
seek a definition of "faculty" in relation to academic freedom issues.
The definition is
online at the Rutgers Council of AAUP Chapters' website. This item was
discussed, and it was pointed out by several Executive Committee
members that the cited definition is an AAUP definition (not a Rutgers
University definition), and that it was not inclusive of all faculty.
Ken Swalagin was asked to contact Leslie Fehrenbach, Secretary of the
University, to ask where the definition of "faculty" appears in
University Policies. Paul Panayotatos said that the Senate had adopted
a recommendation to extend academic freedom to part-time lecturers, and
that the administration has referred that to legal counsel, who are
hesitant to recommend it for addition to University Policy Manual.
Executive Vice President
Edwards confirmed that hesitancy. Panayotatos said that the Faculty and
Personnel Affairs Committee should eventually be issued a charge on the
definition of "faculty."
- Administrative Responses to Senate Reports and Recommendations:
3. Administrative Liaison
President Robert L. Barchi presented an administrative report, which
included comments on:
- planned examination of Rutgers' senior-management-level structure
with respect to new requirements of legislation and implementation of
the medical school integration;
- other issues related to integration of the medical school,
including:
- dealing with the assets of UMDNJ;
- affiliations with Rowan University;
- budgeting considerations and state appropriations; and
- issues related to integration of UMDNJ and Rutgers human
resources systems;
- his plan to not hold formal presidential installation ceremonies,
but instead to hold six smaller, informal meetings with faculty, staff,
and students; and
- major projects being planned:
- integration of UMDNJ units into Rutgers University;
- strategic planning initiative;
- budgeting and financial operations systems review, particularly
in the context of expansion;
- fundraising;
- a planned Rutgers marketing campaign; and
- the planned Rutgers China campus, on which Rutgers will not
move forward at this time due to the complexities and required efforts
of UMDNJ integration.
President Barchi then responded to questions, or heard comments, from
those present on subjects including:
- staffing and administrative structure issues related to UMDNJ
integration and new legislation, particularly provost and chancellor
positions;
- transition of some current administrative positions;
- administrative membership on the Promotion Review Committee;
- span of authority for academic deans;
- budgeting, and recommendations and current charges in the
Senate's Budget and Finance Committee;
- the role of students in strategic planning;
- timing of strategic planning with respect to UMDNJ integration;
- priorities for the bond issue;
- the role and importance of staff in governance and planning;
- concerns about the role of part-time faculty in strategic
planning, particularly because they are not on campus as much as
full-time faculty;
- integration-related issues that the Senate needs to address, such
as redefining clinical faculty, and discussing professors of
professional practice and other faculty categories;
- the role of alumni in marketing and strategic planning efforts;
- tuition structures for in-state and out-of-state students, and
recent media questionings of the value of a college degree;
- the need for Rutgers' administration to be involved at the
national as well as state level in making the case for higher education
funding; and
- how to make the public aware of the need for adequate state
funding.
4. September 21
Senate Meeting
The agenda and format for the September 21, 2012 Senate meeting were
discussed. It was agreed that the agenda would include:
- a brief chairperson's report,
- introduction of committee chairs and their charges,
- President Barchi's administrative report;
- a question-and-answer period following the administrative report,
- a 10-minute recess following the Q&A so that nonsenators who
wished to do so could leave the meeting without disrupting the
proceedings, and
- a regular Senate meeting to include action items docketed later
during this meeting.
[President Barchi and Executive Vice President Edwards left the meeting
at 2:54 p.m.]
5. Standing Committees
The Executive Committee reviewed the Standing Committee
Membership/Rosters,
and discussed potential co-chairs for the Student Affairs Committee
(the committee will select a student co-chair at their first meeting)
and
Research, and Graduate and Professional Education Committee (Jane Otto
will replace Victor Greenhut, who resigned from the position, as
co-chair of that committee). Former Vice President for Student Affairs
Gregory Blimling has not yet been replaced, so Natasha Turski, an
administrator Senator, will serve as administrative liaison to the
Student Affairs Committee.
Issues/Proposed Charges:
Proposed Charge to Academic Standards, Regulations and
Admissions Committee (ASRAC) on Changes to Academic Integrity Policy
Related to University Code of Student Conduct, submitted by Martha
Cotter, ASRAC Co-chair: Martha Cotter summarized her committee's
proposed charge, which was discussed by the Executive Committee and
issued as follows:
Recommend changes to the Rutgers
Academic
Integrity
Policy necessitated by the about-to-be-adopted revised University Code
of
Student Conduct, which states that procedures for adjudicating alleged
violations of academic integrity are specified in the Academic
Integrity
Policy. Required changes to the Academic Integrity Policy therefore
consist, at
a minimum, of incorporation of the procedures for resolving alleged
separable
violations of academic integrity in the appendices to the Policy or in
a
companion document. Also recommend whether some of the revised and
simplified
procedures for handling alleged separable conduct violations in the new
Code of
Student Conduct should also be adopted for resolving alleged violations
of
academic integrity. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by January
2013.
Request for Modification of Research, and Graduate and
Professional
Education Committee (RGPEC) Charge S-1108 on Research Support
Infrastructure, submitted by Gayle
Stein, RGPEC Co-chair: An RGPEC request to divide charge S-1108 was
discussed. The charge was divided into subcharges as listed below, but
RGPEC Co-chair Gayle Stein had asked that she be allowed to
consult with
the RGPEC before requesting deadline, so Ken Swalagin asked that he be
allowed to
assign each an April 2013 deadline, then revise those deadlines when
Stein responds with the RGPEC's suggestions. The Executive Committee
agreed.
Charge S-1108
Research Support Infrastructure:
In preparation for the Rutgers/UMD merger, investigate the status of
the research support infrastructure at Rutgers, including
instrumentation, equipment,maintenance contracts, site licenses, and
shared data storage. Provide recommendations that have the
potential to
reduce associated costs and enhance opportunities for information,
equipment, and instrumentation sharing. Provide recommendations about
research data security and academic and non-academic support services.
Sub-Charges:
S-1108-1 - Data and Information Sharing
- Data and information sharing
- Public vs. private
- RUCore access
- Seminars/workshops
- Streaming video, video on demand
S-1108-2
- Secure Data Storage
- Secure data storage
- Local, central, cloud
- Access
- Working data vs. archived data
- Costs
- Federal policies re data access and storage
S-1108-3
- Data Transport
- Data transport
- Networking
- Internet2
S-1108-4
- Scientific Equipment
- Scientific equipment
- Sharing (maintenance funding)
- Inventory (over $X)
S-1108-5
- Research Support Services
- Research support services
- Site licenses
- High performance computing
- Memberships/subscriptions
- NJEDge.Net, Internet2, etc.
[Dan O'Connor left the meeting at 3:22 p.m.]
Targum Concept Plan Review: In
preparation for a Spring 2013 referendum, The Daily Targum had
submitted a Concept Plan,
audit
reports for the three previous years, and a cover
letter. The Senate's Student Affairs Committee was charged
with reviewing the Concept Plan for educational value, and for the
appropriateness of pursuing special funding.
6. September 21, 2012 Senate Meeting:
In addition to elements discussed in number 4 above, the September 21
Senate activities/meeting will also include:
[Jonathan Muse left the meeting
at 3:30 p.m.]
7. Old Business
There was no old business.
[Martha Cotter and Curtis Danzler left the meeting at 3:46 p.m.]
8. New Business
There was no new business.
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 3:50 p.m.
Written and submitted by,
Ken Swalagin
Executive Secretary of the University Senate