RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
SENATE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
M I N U T E S
November 6, 2009
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bodnar, Borisovets, Gillett,
Gould, Katz (by phone), Leath, Levine, McArdle,
Panayotatos, Rabinowitz (Chair), Schramke, Swalagin
(Executive Secretary), Thompson, Wild
ALSO ATTENDING: Cotter
(Faculty BOG Representative), Fehn (Administrative Liaison), Furmanski (Administrative Liaison), McCormick
(Administrative Liaison)
The regular meeting of the University Senate Executive Committee was held on
Friday, November 6, 2009 at 1:10 p.m. in the Executive Board Room of
Administrative Services Building-III, Cook Campus.
1. Chairperson’s Report
Senate and Executive Committee Chairperson Samuel
Rabinowitz
called the meeting to order at 1:18 p.m., welcoming all present, and
noting that Harriet Katz was participating by phone from Camden. There
was no chairperson's report.
2. Secretary’s Report
-
The meeting agenda was approved as distributed by the Executive Secretary.
- The Minutes of October 9, 2009
Senate Executive Committee Meeting were approved as distributed by the Executive Secretary.
- The following communication was presented by the Executive Secretary, and acted upon as noted by the Executive Committee:
- G. Blimling, at President McCormick's request, has sent a response to the Senate Student Affairs Committee's report on the Targum Concept Plan and Referendum Guidelines. Noted.
- Several members were assigned to the Appeals Panel, based on the
order in which they volunteered. [Additional student members will be
assigned after the volunteering deadline is reached.]
3. Administrative Liaison
President McCormick and Executive Vice President Furmanski presented an administrative report which included comments on:
- Chris Christie's election as Governor of the State of New Jersey;
- the state and Rutgers budgets;
-
Rutgers work on a possible
facilities bond issue that may be on a ballot in 2010;
- meetings or plans for meetings with students on all campuses
to find out their thoughts on how Rutgers can
be improved;
- distribution of student fee funds;
- funding for completion of the stadium lounge/welcome center;
- administrative support for staff- and PTL-Senator elections;
and
- a recent $1 million gift to Rutgers
from former alumna Senator and Executive Committee member Susan Darien and her
husband Steve.
The Executive Committee recommended to Phil Furmanski
several professors for membership on the Committee on Academic Planning and
Review (CAPR).
President McCormick was asked to send a message to unit
deans asking that they not schedule faculty meetings that conflict with Senate
meetings.
4. Standing Committees
Committee Reports:
University Structure and Governance Committee
REVISED Response to Charge S-0805, Senate Representation by Full-time,
Non-tenure-track Faculty - The USGC had been charged as follows: "Charge S-0805 - Senate Representation by Full-time, Non-tenure-track
Faculty: Consider the proposal
to change eligibility for faculty Senator elections
to include full-time,
non-tenure-track faculty." Senator Gillett, co-chair of the USGC,
summarized his committee's report and recommendations, including
changes that were made after the Executive Committee sent the report
back to the USGC in October. During the discussion, Gillett agreed to
ask the USGC if a proposed amendment could be accepted as friendly. The
amendment would change the definition of "annuals" in Recommendation #1
to: "...non-tenure track faculty hired for at least
a calendar or academic year." The words "at least" would be added if
the amendment is accepted by the USGC. The report, which recommends
changes to Senate bylaws, was docketed for introduction at the December
2009 Senate meeting.
Academic Standards, Regulations and Admissions Committee
Response to Charge S-0807, Add/Drop Period. The ASRAC had been charged as follows: "Charge S-0807 - Add/Drop Period: Consider and report on the Proposal
on the add/drop period submitted by Senator Candice Greaux, and the related
resolution from the Rutgers University Student Assembly. Consult with
financial aid personnel at Rutgers
when
discussing the issues in the proposal and resolution. Respond to Senate
Executive Committee by December 2009." Senator Cotter, co-chair of the
ASRAC, explained that, although the report was not yet complete, she
expected to have it ready within a week, and asked that it be docketed
provisionally for Senate action on December 4. The report was so
docketed for the Senate. [Note: The ASRAC was not able to complete the
report for the December Senate meeting, so it was dropped from the
Senate agenda before that agenda was published.]
Proposed Committee Charges:
Proposed Charge or Issue for Discussion on Staff Caucus Recommendations on the Conduct of Senate Elections, sent
by the Staff Caucus: This proposed charge was summarized by Justine
Hernandez Levine on behalf of the Staff Caucus. Secretary Swalagin was
asked to draft a charge to the USGC on this issue, circulate it to the
Executive Committee by email for comment/approval, and, if there were
no objections from the Executive Committee, issue it to the USGC with a
December 2010 deadline. [Note: The charge was subsequently issued as
follows: "S-0915 on Staff Senator Election Processes: Consider the Recommendations
on the Conduct of Staff Senator Elections proposed by the Staff
Caucus. Recommend elements of an inclusive, practical method of electing staff
Senators, based on the proposal, processes used in past staff Senator
elections, and other research and discussion."]
Proposed Charge to Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee on Opportunities
for Full-time Staff Who Teach Part-time, sent by Justine Hernandez
Levine: The following charge, drafted by staff Senator Gayle Stein, was
summarized by Senator Levine on Stein's behalf: "Examine
opportunities available to PTLs who are in a
bargaining unit that are not available to those who are ineligible
(co-adjutants), including internal grants and professional development
opportunities. Assess existing mechanisms used to inform PTLs about
university
academic business to see if they are or can be applied to
co-adjutants." The Executive Committee asked that examples of the
opportunities at issue in the proposed charge be provided before a
charge is issued. Senator Stein will be invited to provide those
examples so the Executive Committee may reconsider this charge at a
subsequent meeting.
Proposed Charge to Academic Standards, Regulations and Admissions Committee
on Merit Scholarship Funding, sent by ASRAC Co-chair Martha Cotter: The
following charge, drafted by staff Senator Dan Schantz (who also
co-chairs the ASRAC), was summarized by Senator Cotter on Schantz's
behalf: "Evaluate current and proposed Rutgers
policies for the awarding and funding of merit, as opposed to need-based,
scholarships for undergraduate students and propose possible changes to those
policies. Questions to be addressed should include: What should be the
appropriate role for merit scholarships in a public university? Should at least
some merit scholarships be funded centrally rather than by individual schools
and colleges? Are current and proposed policies for awarding merit scholarships
highly effective in attracting outstanding students to Rutgers?" The charge was issued as drafted, with an April 2010 reporting deadline.
Proposed Charge to Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee on Application
of the "Ten-Year Rule" in Promotions to Full Professor, sent by FPAC
Co-chair Paul Panayotatos: The following charge, proposed by faculty
Senator Peter Simmons, was summarized by Paul Panayotatos (FPAC
co-chair) on Simmons' behalf: "Investigate the application
of the '10-year rule' in promotions to Full Professor. In particular,
investigate the relative frequency it is being invoked
and the resultant success rate. Also assess whether it has accomplished its original goal of providing an alternative
basis for promotion for faculty who continue
to make significant contributions to the
academic and professional mission of the university after achieving tenure, and whose publication record has not kept pace with
what was expected of them when tenure
was awarded. Propose changes as needed." The charge was issued as drafted, with an April 2010 reporting deadline.
5. December 4,
2009 University Senate Agenda
In addition to the USGC report docketed for introduction above, the
Executive Committee docketed a committee-of-the-whole discussion on the
Academic Integrity Policy, as requested by ASRAC and Ad Hoc Academic
Integrity Committee Chair Martha Cotter. Cotter will draft questions
and a general guide to support the discussion, and Secretary Swalagin
will circulate and publish the documents for the Senate.
6. Old Business
Senator Gillett, co-chair of the USGC, asked that the deadline on
Charge S-0805 on the Senate Handbook review be changed to
March 2010. The EC approved the request for deadline extension. Gillett
also reminded the Executive Committee that the USGC was willing to
accept a charge on Senate representation by part-time lecturers as a
separate constituency from annual-appointee faculty, but Karen Thompson
said she did not wish to pursue the issue as she had previously tried
without success to have the USGC approve her suggested policy changes.
7. New Business
There was no new business.
8. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 3:38 p.m.
Kenneth Swalagin
Executive
Secretary of the University Senate