RUTGERS UNIVERSITY SENATE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
M I N U T E S
November 22, 2013

MEMBERS PRESENT: Barraco (by phone), Berman, Boikess, Burrell, Cotter (Vice Chairperson/New Brunswick Faculty Liaison), Gillett, Gould (Chairperson), Oliver, Puhak, Swalagin (Executive Secretary), Thompson, Vodak

MEMBERS EXCUSED:  Benjamin, Sheth

ALSO ATTENDING: Baffo (Student Representative to the Board of Trustees), Borisovets (Instruction, Curricula and Advising Committee Chair/Liaison), Cashin (Student Representative to the Board of Governors), Novak (Vice President for Continuing Education and Distance Studies), Otto (Research, and Graduate and Professional Education Committee Co-chair/Liaison), Rabinowitz (Faculty Representative to the Board of Governors/Camden Faculty Liaison), Samant (Faculty Representative to the Board of Trustees), Spiegel (Faculty Representative to the Board of Trustees), Stubaus (Vice President for Academic Affairs and Administration), Vaz (Student Representative to the Board of Trustees)

The regular meeting of the University Senate Executive Committee was held on Friday, November 22, 2013 at 1:10 p.m. in the Executive Board Room of Administrative Services Building-III, Cook Campus.


1.     Chairperson’s Report 

Senate and Executive Committee Chairperson Ann Gould called the meeting to order at 1:16 p.m. She informed the Executive Committee that Richard Novak, Vice President for Continuing Education and Distance Studies, would be speaking to the committee that day on the Pearson contract. She also said that she had reached out to Executive Vice President Edwards regarding Senate reports on which the administration had not responded, and had also asked if he would again review the Senate recommendations on tuition remission for PTLs.

2.    Secretary’s Report - Ken Swalagin, Executive Secretary of the Senate
3.    Pearson eCollege and Online Degree Programs - Richard Novak,  Vice President for Continuing Education and Distance Studies

Richard Novak, Vice President for Continuing Education and Distance Studies, and Karen Stubaus, Vice President for Academic Affairs and Administration, joined the meeting at 1:30 p.m. Novak spoke and responded to questions on distance learning and Pearson eCollege at some length. Stubaus also participated in the discussion and question-and-answer period. Ann Gould, noting that Senator Boikess had asked that someone be invited to present a differing perspective on Pearson, said that she would contact David Hughes, and possibly Rudy Bell, about presenting at a future Executive Committee meeting.

4.    Standing Committees

Committee Reports

Instruction, Curricula and Advising Committee (ICAC) Response to Charge S-1308 on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Reconsidered - Natalie Borisovets, ICAC chair, summarized her committee's report in response to Charge S-1308 on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Reconsidered. The ICAC had been charged as follows:

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Reconsidered: Reconsider and make recommendations regarding the current and rapidly changing situation with Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), and Rutgers policies and procedures related to MOOCs. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by January 2014.

Borisovets noted that, in the interim since the ICAC received this charge, the Senate had also received President Barchi's response to the February 2013 ICAC/Senate Response to Report and Recommendations on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). The report was docketed for action at the December 6 Senate meeting.

Academic Standards, Regulations and Admissions Committee (ASRAC) Response to Charge S-1206 on Academic Regulations, Student Performance, and Use of Resources -
Martha Cotter, ASRAC co-chair, said that her committee may be able to finalize a report on Charge S-1206, on Academic Regulations, Student Performance, and Use of Resources, to be docketed for action at the December Senate meeting. The ASRAC had been charged as follows:

Academic Regulations, Student Achievement, and Effective Use of Resources: Examine how well current academic regulations and procedures serve to maximize student academic achievement and result in the most effective use of our resources. In particular, look at the effect on student achievement and use of resources of regulations and procedures related to (1) students retaking courses they have failed or withdrawn from many times; (2) replacement of grades when a student retakes a course; (3) dismissal of students for poor academic performance and readmission of students who have been dismissed; and (4) deadlines for withdrawal from courses. Suggest changes in policies and procedures where needed in order more effectively to foster student success and use limited resources. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by December 2013.

The anticipated report was docketed provisionally for action at the December Senate meeting. It is to be circulated by email to the Executive Committee before being placed on the Senate agenda. [Note: The ASRAC was not able to finalize the report in time for the December Senate meeting.]

Issues/Proposed Charges:

Potential Charge to University Structure and Governance Committee (USGC) on Senator Allocation for University Libraries - Submitted by Senator Marianne Gaunt and Executive Secretary Ken Swalagin. Secretary Swalagin summarized what he, in consultation with Senator/University Librarian Marianne Gaunt, had proposed as a charge to the USGC, as follows:

Draft Proposed Charge: Consider and make recommendations on adding additional faculty Senator positions to the University Libraries, and whether those allocations can be made at-large without employing the formula used for most other faculty Senator entitlements.

Rationale: The University Libraries currently do not have the option afforded most other faculty units within the Senate, wherein the number of Senators to which the unit is entitled may be based on the number of faculty lines, or the number of full-time-equivalent students. Many units' faculty Senator entitlements are based on the number of students rather than the number of faculty lines, because that formula yields a larger entitlement. Although the libraries serve all Rutgers students, faculty, as well as the greater Rutgers community, the number of Senators allocated to this universitywide unit is only two. It seems appropriate that, in the case of the University Libraries, the Senate entitlement should be a designated number similar to that of at-large faculty, staff, or alumni.

Senator Gillett, USGC co-chair, recommended that the USGC be allowed to consider this issue as part of Charge S-1307, which had been issued as follows:

Campus-Based Senate Eligibility: Consider and make recommendations regarding campus-based Senate eligibility and Executive Committee positions in light of the integration of UMDNJ. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by January 2014.

Gillett's suggestion was endorsed by the Executive Committee, which broadened (by removing the term "campus-based") and reissued Charge S-1307 as follows:

Senate and Executive Committee Eligibility: Consider and make recommendations regarding Senate eligibility and Executive Committee positions in light of the integration of UMDNJ. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by January 2014.


Potential Charge to Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee (FPAC) on
Travel and Business Expense Reimbursement - Submitted by Senator Ann Gould, FPAC Co-chair, on behalf of the FPAC. Ann Gould summarized a charge which she had proposed, as follows:

Travel and Business Expense Reimbursement (TABER): Review current university policies and practices concerning reimbursement to faculty and staff for professional expenditures, including but not limited to, travel, conference attendance, and purchases; survey impacted constituencies for suggestions, and  propose possible modifications or improvements to the current system. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by November 2014.

Rationale:The Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee respectfully requests that the Senate Executive Committee issue a charge to the F&PAC (solely or jointly with another committee).We perceive substantial faculty and staff dissatisfaction with the present TABER system, based in part on the substantial delays encountered and the burdens of required documentation, even for minor expenditures. With the merger of the medical school, which may have somewhat different traditions and practices, into Rutgers, this requested charge is especially timely.

During discussion, it was agreed that, if the FPAC had questions it believed the Budget and Finance Committee (BFC) may be able to answer, it would bring those questions to the BFC. The charge was then issued as proposed.

Charge Deadline Extensions:

Deadlines on pending committee charges were extended as follows:
5.    Agenda for December 6, 2013 Senate Meeting

The agenda for the December 6, 2013 Senate meeting was discussed. Specifically:
6.   Old Business

Strategic Plan: Senator Gillett noted that the Strategic Planning website is not up to date, and that the posted Strategic Plan Framework does not include the Senate's additional foundational element, which was accepted by President Barchi when adopted by the Senate. He suggested that, if the plan is to be presented to the Board of Governors on December 3, there should be a plan to voice Senate objections to the plan, if there are any such objections.

7.    New Business

There was no new business.

8.    Adjournment

The meeting adjourned at 4:07 p.m.

Minutes written and submitted by,

Ken Swalagin
Executive Secretary of the University Senate