UNIVERSITY SENATE
Executive Committee
A G E N D
A
April 8, 2011 - 1:10
p.m.
1.
Chairpersons' Report
2. Secretary’s Report
- Approval of Agenda
- Approval of Minutes of March 11, 2011
Senate Executive Committee Meeting
- Communications:
- PTL/Annual Appointee Faculty Senator Election Update
- Website Update
- Administration advises that the Academic Integrity Policy
Implementation Committee has been established, and that its membership
includes: Martha Cotter, Chair; Sarah Balkin; Sanjib Bhuyan; Joshua
David; John Gunkel; Greg Jackson; Susan E. Lawrence; Muffin Lord;
Jonathan Nycz; Angela O'Donnell; Nancy G. Rosoff.
3.
Administrative Liaison
4. Committee Reports:
Budget and Finance Committee
Response
to Charge S-0914, All-Funds Budgeting Integration - The BFC had
been charged as follows:
All-Funds Budgeting
Integration: Investigate the
integration of all-funds budgeting with the university planning objectives and
its implementation. Also investigate how all-funds budgeting applies at the
department level.
University Structure and Governance Committee
Response
to Charge A-1102A, Proposal for a New School of Nursing-Camden - The USGC had
been charged as follows:
Proposal for New
School of Nursing-Camden:
Discuss, document findings, and make recommendations on the Proposal
to Establish a School
of Nursing at
Rutgers-Camden. Discuss with Camden Chancellor Pritchett or his
representative, who will attend your March 2011 meeting, any questions or
concerns you may have relating to the proposal. Also, include in your
deliberations advice from the three Senate committees instructed in Charge
A-1102 above [For purposes of this email, that charge is appended below].
Decide if the Senate should endorse establishment of this new school. By April
1, 2011, prepare and send to the Senate Executive Secretary your advice,
findings, and recommendations on the proposal, which will be forwarded to the
Senate Executive Committee to docket for Senate action.
Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee
Response
to Charge S-0917, Application of the "Ten-Year Rule" in Promotions to Full Professor - The FPAC had
been charged as follows:
Application of the
“Ten-Year Rule” in Promotions to Full Professor: Investigate the application of the
"ten-year rule" in promotions to full professor. In particular, investigate the relative frequency it is being
invoked and the resultant success rate. Also assess
whether it has accomplished its original goal
of providing an alternative basis for promotion
for faculty who continue to make significant contributions to the academic and professional mission of the university
after achieving tenure, and whose publication
record has not kept pace with what was expected
of them when tenure was awarded. Propose
changes as needed.
Research, and Graduate and Professional Education Committee
Response
to Charge S-1009, NRC Rankings of Graduate Programs - The RGPEC had
been charged as follows:
Research, and Graduate and Professional Education Committee
Response
to Charge S-0912, Online Courses in Masters and Professional Degree Programs - The RGPEC had
been charged as follows:
Online Courses in
Master's and Professional Degree Programs: Review, discuss, and make recommendations on how Rutgers
can best utilize online courses in master’s and professional degrees. Review
the recommendation from the Senate Instruction, Curricula, & Advising
Committee on hybrid courses. Evaluate the means by which online courses are set
up, and suggest improved means for encouraging Rutgers
departments and schools to take advantage of the availability of online,
distance-learning, and hybrid courses.
Academic Standards, Regulations and Admissions Committee
Response
to Charge A-1004 (Formerly S-0906), Academic Calendar, Commencement Dates, Updated - The ASRAC had
been charged as follows:
Academic Calendar,
Commencement Dates: Consider and
decide on Secretary of the University Leslie Fehrenbach's request
(and its
attachment) that the University Senate change the University Commencement
dates on the academic
calendar for academic years 2010-11 and beyond.
Instruction, Curriculum and Advising Committee
Response
to Charge S-1015, Online Education at Rutgers - The ICAC had
been charged as follows:
Online Education at
Rutgers: Survey the existing
state of online education at Rutgers, and identify issues and challenges.
Issues/Proposed Charges/Modification of Current Charges:
Charge to USGC on Reassessing the Senate's Committee Structure
to determine whether staff issues are being addressed, if there is a
need for a Staff Affairs Committee, and to evaluate the ongoing need
for the Research, and Graduate and Professional Education Committee,
per the Senate's November 2008 Response
to Charge S-0704, Senate Committee Structure.
ASRAC Requests that Charge S-0916 on Merit Scholarship Funding be Dropped:
ASRAC Co-chair Martha Cotter writes, "ASRAC would like the EC to remove
Charge S-0916 on Merit Scholarship Funding. We plan to ask the EC to
issue a more narrowly focused charge on the same subject in June, but
are still discussing the precise wording." The ASRAC had been charged
as follows:
Merit
Scholarship Funding:
Evaluate current Rutgers policies and practices regarding the awarding and
funding of merit scholarships for undergraduate students. Propose possible
changes to make those policies and practices more effective in attracting outstanding
students to Rutgers. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by March 2011.
Follow-Up Charge to ASRAC on Academic Calendar, Add/Drop Period:
An extended trial period for the extended add/drop period was advanced
by the ASRAC, and adopted by the Senate, last month. The Executive
Committee still needs to issue a charge to the ASRAC to determine
whether the changes should be made permanent. The following is an excerpt from the March 2011 Senate Executive Committee meeting minutes:
"Academic Standards, Regulations and Admissions Committee (ASRAC) Follow-Up
Report on Response to
Charge S-0807, Add/Drop Period - ASRAC Co-chair Martha Cotter had
written to Secretary Swalagin: "I've now discussed the matter with members of
ASRAC and we are in agreement that we do not have enough information to evaluate the pros and cons
of extending both the drop
and add periods by one day and that we wish to extend the trial of the extended
add/drop period for one more academic year, with the proviso that we will evaluate the trial thoroughly
in the fall 2011 semester. I will write up what
we have agreed on and get it to you by the middle of next week at the very latest. We would
like to docket it for the
March meeting." Cotter summarized the ASRAC's discussions and intent on this
matter. The anticipated report was docketed for action at the March 25, 2011
Senate meeting. Cotter will draft and send to Swalagin a charge for the ASRAC to
address the issue of whether the extension of the add/drop period should be made
permanent."
[From March 2011] Proposed Charge on Teaching-Assessment Mechanisms: The following is an excerpt from the March 2011 Senate Executive Committee meeting minutes:
"Leslie Fishbein raised an issue on how Rutgers might create more effective
teaching-assessment mechanisms that would help ensure that students are properly
placed in introductory courses, that there are learning goals and rubrics for
testing all of those goals, that grade inflation is minimized, and academic
outcomes in general are improved. Fishbein will send Swalagin a draft proposal
and charge to docket on the April 8 Executive Committee agenda."
Proposed Charge to Committee on Establishing an Asian American Studies Program: The Rutgers University Student Assembly has submitted a Resolution in Support of Establishing an Asian American Studies Program.
5. April 29, 2011 University Senate Agenda
- Election of 2011-12 Senate Chair, Vice Chair, Executive Committee Members,
and Board Representatives
- Meeting should begin at 10:00 or 10:30 a.m. to accommodate a large number of committee reports.
- Establish scheduling and timetable, including time limits.
6. Old
Business
7. New Business
8. Adjournment