UNIVERSITY SENATE
Executive Committee
A G E N D A
November 7, 2008 - 1:10 p.m.
1. Chairpersons' Report
- Induction of Daniel McArdle, CCAS Student, as Camden Student Member of the Executive Committee.
Senator McArdle replaces Max Kind, who resigned his Executive Committee
position last month. Senator McArdle was the sole, eligible nominee for
the position, so no election was necessary.
2. Secretary’s Report
3. Administrative Liaison
4. Standing Committees
Committee Reports:
University Structure and Governance Committee Response to Charge S-0107, Referendum Guidelines Review
Faculty Affairs and Personnel Committee Response to Charge S-0710, Tuition Remission for Part-Time Lecturer Faculty
Proposed Charges/Issues:
Proposed Charge to Academic Standards, Regulations and
Admissions Committee (ASRAC), requested by the ASRAC: Monitor the
progress of implementation of the Interim Academic Integrity Policy
and of the University-wide Academic Integrity Committee's (AIC) efforts
to develop a new, permanent academic integrity policy. Provide
ongoing input to the new AIC charged with developing the new AI policy.
Report to the Senate on progress to date toward the end of the 2008-9
academic year. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by April 2009.
Proposed Charge to Instruction, Curricula and Advising
Committee on Implementation of 2006 ICAC Recommendations on
Availability of Syllabi: Revised Proposal submitted by Candice Greaux, with a related resolution from the Rutgers University Student Assembly.
Proposed Charge to University
Structure and Governance Committee on Including Senior Vice President
for Finance and Administration (SVPFA) as Administrator Senator,
submitted by Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs Phil
Furmanski. The charge would ask the USGC to consider recommending to
the Senate that it approve adding the SVPFA as an ex officio, with
vote, administrator Senator, as are currently the President, Executive
Vice President for Academic Affairs, chancellors, and school and
college deans.
Proposed Charge to Instruction, Curricula and
Advising Committee on Teaching Evaluations,
submitted by PTL Senators Won-Jong Rhee and Karen Thompson [Note: This
item was tabled at the September 2008 EC. Senator Thompson was excused
from the October EC meeting, so this item is redocketed here. The
following excerpt from the September EC minutes describes the status of
the proposal: "Natalie Borisovets, longtime chair of the Instruction,
Curricula and Advising Committee, pointed out that the Senate had
considered this issue multiple times. Paul Panayotatos, co-chair of the
Faculty Affairs and Personnel Committee, directed the committee's
attention to a 2002 report on Best Practices in
Assessment of Teaching, which had come from the FAPC then co-chaired by Paul
Leath and Barbara Lee. Candice Greaux pointed out that a recent Rutgers
University Student Assembly resolution encourages more informative and
responsible alternatives to "Rate My Professor" online. Thompson agreed to
review the 2002 FAPC report, consult with her co-proposer, Senator Rhee, and
consult with Panayotatos and Leath, and perhaps Gary Gigliotti, by e-mail. The
proposal will be redocketed for the October Executive Committee meeting. No
charge was issued."] The proposal, as submitted, is:
Investigate and consider
the current system of teaching evaluations, including how forms are designed,
distributed, collected and archived. Make recommendations about
changes necessary to ensure effectiveness, transparency, and fairness for all
concerned. In particular, consider the feasibility and usefulness
of a special teaching evaluation team or committee (under the EVPAA) responsible
to oversee the teaching evaluation procedure and including representatives from
relevant constituencies, such as students, PTLs, and non-tenure-track as well as
tenured faculty. Considerations that fall within this charge might
include: oversight for consistent implementation, use of teaching
evaluations in aggregate only, appropriate use of teaching evaluations within
the reappointment / promotion process (e.g., consideration of relevant factors
such as class size, difficulty of subject, class times, etc.), creation of added
incentives for excellence in teaching, and so on.
Issue Raised/Proposed Charge to Academic Standards, Regulations and Admissions Committee on Academic Calendar, Spring Break, and Saturday Classes, requested by Sam Rabinowitz
Issue Raised/Potential Charge on Parking Permits, submitted by Staff Senator Crystal Grant
5. November 21, 2008 University Senate Agenda
6. Old Business
7. New Business
8. Adjournment