Academic
Standards, Regulations, and Admissions Committee (ASRAC) Response
to Charge S-1206 on Academic Regulations, Student Achievement, and
Effective Use of Resources - Martha Cotter and
Dan Schantz, ASRAC Co-chairs
ASRAC
Co-chairs Martha Cotter and Daniel Schantz presented their committee's
report on Charge S-1206 on Academic Regulations, Student Achievement,
and Effective Use of Resources. Cotter summarized the report, which was
a response to the ASRAC having
been
charged as follows:
Academic
Regulations,
Student Achievement, and Effective Use of Resources:
Examine how well current academic regulations and procedures serve to
maximize student academic achievement and result in the most effective
use of
our resources. In particular, look at the effect on student achievement
and use
of resources of regulations and procedures related to (1) students
retaking
courses they have failed or withdrawn from many times; (2) replacement
of
grades when a student retakes a course; (3) dismissal of students for
poor
academic performance and readmission of students who have been
dismissed; and
(4) deadlines for withdrawal from courses. Suggest changes in policies
and
procedures where needed in order more effectively to foster student
success and
use limited resources.
Cotter said that, on the recommendation of Senate Parliamentarian
Peter Gillett, Recommendations 1 and 5 would be considered separately,
and 2, 3, and 4 would be considered as a group. Recommendation 1 was
then adopted unanimously without question or comment from the Senate.
Senator Gillett moved that Recommendation 3 be clarified to indicate
that any given course could only be replaced once. The amendment was
accepted as friendly by Cotter. On Recommendation 2, Senator Samuel
Berman moved to increase the number of replaceable grades from four to
six. The motion was seconded, and discussed. The motion failed by a
large majority. Recommendations 2, 3, and 4 were voted on as a group
and adopted with few opposed. Recommendation 5 was adopted without
discussion, with one opposed.
There was no comment, question, or discussion from the Senate on
the report. The report did not include any recommendations for change
to current Rutgers policy or practice, and was therefore presented for
information only. No vote was taken on this matter.