RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
SENATE
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
M I N U T E S
October 5, 2012
MEMBERS PRESENT: Barraco, Berman, Boikess,
Borisovets, Gillett, Gould, Panayotatos (Chair), Puhak,
Rosario, Swalagin
(Executive
Secretary), Thompson
MEMBERS EXCUSED: Bubb,
Dantzler, Muse
ALSO
ATTENDING: Barchi (Administrative Liaison/University President),
Cashin (Student Board of Governors Representative), Cotter
(Faculty Board of Trustees Representative), Greenhut
(Senate Parliamentarian), Haibach (Graduate Student Board of Trustees
Representative), O'Connor (New
Brunswick Faculty Liaison),Otto (Research, and Graduate &
Professional Education Committee Co-chair), Rabinowitz (Faculty
Board of Governors
Representative), Spiegel (Faculty Board of Trustee
Representative)
The regular meeting of the University Senate Executive Committee was
held on
Friday, October 5, 2012 at 1:10 p.m. in the Executive Board Room of
Administrative Services Building-III, Cook Campus.
1. Chairperson’s Report
Senate and Executive Committee Chairperson Paul Panayotatos called the
meeting to order at 1:15 p.m.
2. Secretary’s Report - Ken Swalagin,
Executive Secretary of the Senate
3. Administrative Liaison
President Robert L. Barchi presented an administrative report, which
included comments on:
- the planned Rutgers China campus, on which Rutgers will not
move forward at this time;
- the success of six breakfast meetings he hosted to dialog with
the Rutgers community;
- issues related to integration of the medical school,
including:
- movement from discussion and negotiation to asset transfer
implementation;
- biweekly meetings with a small executive committee;
- dealing with the assets of UMDNJ;
- meetings scheduled with Rutgers boards' committees in the next
three weeks;
- anticipated meetings of Rutgers and UMDNJ trustee organizations;
- disposition of debt and arbitrage of value;
- discussions of how to deal with malpractice exposure of the
clinical practices;
- examination of revenues; and
- issues related to integration of UMDNJ and Rutgers human
resources systems;
President Barchi then responded to questions, or heard comments, from
those present on subjects including:
- debt and cash flow issues related to UMDNJ
integration and new legislation;
- indemnification of UMDNJ faculty for non-criminal negligence in
the course of performance of jobs;
- transition of the current administrative structure, particularly
provost and chancellor
positions; and
- administrative membership on the Promotion Review Committee.
President Barchi continued his administrative report with comments on
subjects including:
- the strategic planning process, which is ongoing; and
- the concept of Rutgers as one university with three unique
campuses.
President Barchi then responded to questions, or heard additional
comments on:
- rankings of Rutgers programs;
- research funding, and alumni giving;
- how the Senate may best help him, and Rutgers, move forward (by
providing a forum for honest dialog about problems, making him aware of
those problems, and help him communicate with the Rutgers community by
acting as liaisons with Senators' constituencies;
- timelines and strategies for implementing the new administrative
structure; and
- concerns of UMDNJ faculty regarding their clinical practice in
Newark, and about differences in UMDNJ and Rutgers promotions
procedures.
[President Barchi left the meeting at 2:12 p.m.]
4. Standing Committees
Committee Reports
Budget
and Finance Committee (BFC) Response
to Charge S-1103 on Information
Technology and IT Services at Rutgers - BFC Chair Menahem
Spiegel summarized his committee's report and recommendations on Charge
S-1103 on Information Technology and IT Services at Rutgers. The BFC
had been
charged as follows:
"Evaluate
aspects of
information technology services at Rutgers including whether systems
communicate effectively with each other, incorporate user experience
levels and
feedback, are user-friendly, improve data flow, and enhance
coordination among
information technology personnel. Explore ways that the Office of
Information
Technology can more efficiently provide services to users. Identify
opportunities for Rutgers
to centralize or take a more distributive approach to various
information
technology functions, and investigate the advantages and disadvantages
of
deploying more open software. If developments during the time of
deliberations
warrant it, consider the ramifications of a reunification of Robert
Wood
Johnson Medical with Rutgers New Brunswick
on the above." The report was docketed for action at the upcoming
Senate meeting.
Research,
and Graduate and
Professional Education Committee (RGPEC) Response
to Charge S-1107 on
Publication Repository and Supporting Documents:
Open
Access Factsheet and
Open
Access Presentation - RGPEC Co-chair
Jane Otto summarized her committee's report and recommendations on
Charge S-1107 on Publications Repository/Open Access. The RGPEC had
been
charged as follows:
"Examine the possibility of a
Rutgers-specific,
centrally driven publication repository for published papers and books.
Provide
data about similar services at peer and aspirant universities." Changes
were suggested to reformat the report's resolution, and Otto accepted
those suggestions and said she would revise the resolution. Otto was
asked to revise the recommendations to include "Investigate some means
by which to reference opted-out articles." She offered to take the
suggestion back to the committee. The report was docketed provisionally
for action at the upcoming Senate meeting. Otto said she would transmit
the final-form report to Senate Secretary Swalagin within one week.
[Jane Otto left the meeting at 2:55
p.m.]
Issues/Proposed
Charges:
Proposed
Charge to Student
Affairs Committee (SAC) on Campus Study Areas for Commuter Students
submitted by Senator Joseph Cashin: A
charge to investigate
and determine the opening of a study area on
each campus for commuter students, submitted by Senator Joseph Cashin,
was discussed, and issued to the Student Affairs Committee as follows: "Early-Open
Study Space: Determine
the interest in, and
feasibility of, a study area on each campus opening early (5:00 a.m.)
for
commuter students. Respond to Senate Executive Committee by February
2013."
Charge Review:
Continue,
Drop, or Modify Charge S-1205 on Academic
Freedom at Rutgers/South China
University of Technology Joint Venture:
Charge S-1205 had been issued previously to the Faculty and Personnel
Affairs Committee as follows: "Investigate
and
consider the extent to which academic freedom and students' right to
free
speech and assembly will be the standard at the new, joint venture that
Rutgers
is undertaking with South China University of Technology. Investigate
the
profile of the expected faculty, detailing what proportions will be
tenured,
tenure-track, and non-tenure-track, and full-time or part-time.
Consider the
need for any initiative to which Rutgers attaches its name and where
Rutgers
faculty may be affiliated to maintain all the protections and freedoms
associated with employment here in the United States. Make
recommendations on
how to best ensure that Rutgers' name and faculty are protected with
regard to
academic freedom, tenure, and freedom of expression and assembly.
Respond
to Senate Executive Committee by December 2012." In response to the
termination or postponement of plans for the Rutgers undertaking in
China, the charge was dropped.
5.
Agenda for October 19, 2012 Senate Meeting
In addition to docketing the committee reports indicated above, the
Executive Committee agreed that, in accordance with established Senate
practices, the administrative report would be placed after all
Senate-action items on the October meeting agenda. Chairperson
Panayotatos asked if there were any issues appropriate for an open
forum or committee-of-the-whole discussion at the Senate meeting. No
such issues were raised.
6. Old
Business
There was no old business.
7. New Business
There was no new business.
8. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 3:19 p.m.
Written and submitted by,
Ken Swalagin
Executive Secretary of the University Senate