UNIVERSITY SENATE
Executive Committee

A G E N D A

April 13, 2012 - 1:10 p.m.

[Note: Only the blue links are working. Underlined, black-text links will become active if/when those committee reports are received. If not received, their reporting deadlines will need extension.]


1.    Chairpersons' Report

2.    Secretary’s Report 3.    Administrative Liaison 4.    Standing Committees

Committee Reports:

Budget and Finance Committee Response to Charge S-1103 on Information Technology and IT Services at Rutgers - The BFC has been charged as follows:

Evaluate aspects of information technology services at Rutgers including whether systems communicate effectively with each other, incorporate user experience levels and feedback, are user-friendly, improve data flow, and enhance coordination among information technology personnel. Explore ways that the Office of Information Technology can more efficiently provide services to users. Identify opportunities for Rutgers to centralize or take a more distributive approach to various information technology functions, and investigate the advantages and disadvantages of deploying more open software. If developments during the time of deliberations warrant it, consider the ramifications of a reunification of Robert Wood Johnson Medical with Rutgers New Brunswick on the above.

Instruction, Curricula and Advising Committee Response to Charge S-0808A Implementation of 2006 Senate Recommendations on Availability of Syllabi - The ICAC has been charged as follows:

Consider and report on the Proposal submitted by Senator Candice Greaux, and the related resolution from the Rutgers University Student Assembly, regarding implementation of the Senate's recommendations on availability of syllabi, contained in the 2006 Instruction, Curricula and Advising Committee's Response to Charge S-0313, Availability of Syllabi during Add/Drop. Also consider how new technologies, and emphasis on learning goals and assessment objectives for courses, have changed the definition of "syllabus."

Academic Standards, Regulations and Admissions Committee Response to Charge S-1003A on Academic Calendar, Part 2, Continued - The ASRAC has been charged as follows:

Continue consideration of future changes to the academic calendar to extend beyond what was recommended for September and November 2011 by the Senate in October 2010.

Original Charge with Subsequent Addenda: Consider the potential problems with the Fall 2010 academic calendar brought to the Senate’s attention by Senator Ted Szatrowski; namely, the fact that the first class meeting for sections of courses meeting on Monday only will not take place until near the end of the second week of classes. Evaluate the difficulties this will cause for faculty and students. Consult with Arun Mukherjee, University Director of Scheduling and Space Management, with appropriate staff in the Office of Information Technology (OIT), and with representatives of various schools and colleges and recommend whether or not changes should be made to the Fall 2010 academic calendar to solve the problems identified. Also revisit the academic calendar for subsequent years to see if changes should be made in order to avoid similar problems with Monday classes in the future.  [Note: Two partial responses to this charge have been adopted by the Senate and sent to the administration. They are: Response to Charge S-1003, Fall 2010 Academic Calendar (April 2010) and Partial Response to Charge S-1003 on Fall 2011 Academic Calendar (October 2010).] 

Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee Response to Charge S-1016A on Academic Freedom and Faculty Participation in University Governance - The FPAC has been charged as follows:

Review current recognition and protection of academic freedom in University policies, traditions and practices, with particular emphasis on the relationship between academic freedom and faculty participation in University governance.

Research, and Graduate and Professional Education Committee Response to Charge S-1108 on Research Support Infrastructure - The RGPEC has been charged as follows:

In preparation for the Rutgers/UMD merger, investigate the status of the research support infrastructure at Rutgers, including instrumentation, equipment, maintenance contracts, site licenses, and shared data storage. Provide recommendations that have the potential to reduce associated costs and enhance opportunities for information, equipment, and instrumentation sharing. Provide recommendations about research data security and academic and non-academic support services.

Update on Status of Student Affairs Committee Response to Charge S-1202 on Separation of Rutgers-Camden from Rutgers University - Deadline extension required. The SAC has been charged as follows:

Examine the short- and long-term ramifications of the proposed separation of Rutgers-Camden from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, as they relate to, and from the perspectives of, past, present, and prospective students.

Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee Response to Charge S-1203 on Separation of Rutgers-Camden from Rutgers University - The FPAC has been charged as follows:

Examine the short- and long-term ramifications of the proposed separation of Rutgers-Camden from Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, as they relate to, and from the perspectives of, past, present, and prospective faculty and staff.

Issues/Proposed Charges:

Deadline Extensions Required for Pending Charges: Any reports listed above under "Committee Reports" that are not docketed for the Senate at this Executive Committee meeting will require extension of the related charge deadlines, or discontinuation of the charge.

Proposed Charge to Faculty and Personnel Affairs Committee on Rutgers-China, submitted by Karen Thompson, as discussed at the March 2012 Executive Committee meeting:

Investigate and consider the extent to which academic freedom and students' right to free speech and assembly will be the standard at the new, joint venture that Rutgers is undertaking with South China University of Technology. Develop a profile of the expected faculty, detailing what proportions will be tenured, tenure-track, and non-tenure-track, and full-time or part-time. Consider the need for any initiative to which Rutgers attaches its name and where Rutgers faculty may be affiliated to maintain all the protections and freedoms associated with employment here in the United States. Make recommendations on how to best ensure that Rutgers' name and faculty are protected with regard to academic freedom, tenure, and freedom of expression and assembly.
5.   Nominating Panel Update and Suggestion of Candidates for 2012-13 Senate Officers, Executive Committee Members, and Board Representatives - This year, the Nominating Panel consists of the Executive Committee members, and Victor Greenhut as chair. Ken Swalagin will present the 2012-13 slate, and the panel will be asked to suggest others from next-year's Senate rosters, which will be distributed in hardcopy at the meeting.

6.    University Senate April 27, 2012 Agenda
7.    Old Business

Comments on Recording of Lecturer/Presentations: Gayle Stein has posted online the Senate recommendations on Recording of Lectures/Presentations, along with a comments section.

8.    New Business

9.    Adjournment